Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Dutch Researcher Created A Super-Influenza Virus With The Potential To Kill Millions
Debate rages over publishing new bird flu research - Winnipeg Free Press
Staff to be banned from sending emails - Telegraph

Monday, November 28, 2011

Political Islam // Articles // A First Step

A First Step

A First Step

Tennessee State Representative Rick Womick, a former fighter pilot, unleashed some firepower in a speech in which he said that Muslims should not serve in the US military. Needless to say, the usual suspects, including the morally corrupt ADL, howled that Representative Womick is a hater and Islamophobe. Muslims were offended.

Representative Womick’s suggestion does not go far enough, but it is a good first step. How can this be? Why shouldn’t a Muslim serve in our military? A good Muslim must obey Allah and imitate Mohammed. And Allah and Mohammed divide the world into two classes—believers (Muslims) and non-believers. The whole group of non-believers--Christians, Jews, pagans and all others are named Kafirs. The majority of the Koran is about Kafirs and nearly of it is negative . Mohammed became successful when he turned to total war against the Kafirs. He was involved in an act of violence against them on the average of every 6 weeks over the last 9 years of his life. A Muslim can kill Kafirs, but he is not supposed to kill other Muslims.

Koran 4:93 He that kills a believer by design shall burn in Hell for ever. He shall incur the wrath of God, who will lay His curse on him and prepare for him a mighty scourge.

When the US sends troops to fight against Muslims, what must the follower of the Koran do? Whose commands will he follow—Allah’s or Kafir officers’?

An American soldier takes an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies, both foreign and domestic. But, we have a problem here. A Muslim is one who follows the religious and political doctrine of Islam. What does political Islam say about the Constitution? Islamic political and religious doctrine says that Sharia is sacred law, and must supplant our manmade Constitution. Will a Muslim protect our Constitution against political Islam? Maybe, but according to Islamic doctrine, he should not.

We must see the fallacy of: “I know of Muslims who serve in the military and they do a good job.” But do they do a good job because of Islam or by overlooking Islam? All Muslims have three modes of behavior—Meccan Islam (generally religious), Medinan Islam (political, jihad) and Kafir. Most of those who call themselves a Muslim do not follow Islam at all times. They may be cultural Muslims who overlook the political aspects of Islam and enjoy living in Kafir civilization.

But, and this is a big but, every Muslim, no matter how moderate, believes that there is no god but Allah and that the Koran is His perfect manifestation in this world. The majority (64%) of the Koran is devoted to the Kafir and it is massively negative, bigoted, murderous and hateful. Islam is profoundly and eternally anti-Kafir. So, serving in a Kafir military has a built in contradiction for any Muslim. Why should he serve those whom Islamic political doctrine denigrates in every way?

There is another contradiction about Muslims serving in our military—the more adherent they are to the Koran, the more apt they are to see their fellow soldiers as Kafirs and treat them as such. Mohammed would treat a Kafir nicely at first. But, there always came a time when the Kafir had to submit to Mohammed. The Koran has 13 verses that say that a Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir when it comes to Islam, so this is not a trivial problem.

But the major problem is that we Kafirs are not supposed to talk about whether a Muslim can serve in our military or not. We are supposed to obey the Establishment’s decree that Islam is an equal member of our civilization and cannot be questioned. The Establishment’s politically correct rules are that it is bigoted to want to talk about what it means to have someone in a critical security position who believes a text that is dedicated to the annihilation of Kafir civilization. It is frightening to read Islam’s sacred texts and see how cruel they are to Kafirs. The Establishment says that Kafirs cannot talk about their fears, because fears are irrational and immoral.

Why is it that the Establishment suppresses all attempts to talk about the true nature of Allah and Mohammed and those who follow them? Why can’t we talk about this and stop with the self-censorship? We don’t ask for the suppression of Establishment apologists. We Kafirs only want a forum to talk about Islam beyond the apologist/Islamo-philic bias. We want critical thought and debate, and fact-based reasoning, not insults and denial. Kafirs want a seat at the public forum, and not be shoved aside with insults. Kafirs want to talk about the implications of Sharia, the fruit of Islamic doctrine without being condemned, out of hand. Kafirs have always been the victims of political Islam and its Sharia. It is time for our side to be heard.

Why is the Kafir-centric view of Islam called bad/wrong/immoral? Why is talking about Islam’s hateful attitude about Kafirs wrong? Why can’t we talk about those who hold a political doctrine that includes violence against the very people who they are supposed to protect? Representative Rick Womick has started the conversation. But, we need to talk about a lot more than just Muslims in our military. Let’s talk about Sharia and political Islam in all aspects of our nation from the Kafir’s point of view.

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Learn From My FAIL: Zombies Love Cuddles - EPIC FAIL Funny Videos and Epic Fail Funny Pictures
Loving the Husband More Than the Kids is Key to Good Life | Parenting - Yahoo! Shine

Saturday, November 26, 2011

(10) The Guardian on Facebook

Friday, November 25, 2011

The myth of renewable energy | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Thursday, November 24, 2011

The Enterprise Mission
US diplomat tells China to act responsibly in Africa - Yahoo! News

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

The World's Best Turkey Recipe -

Monday, November 21, 2011

Cotton Candy (prototype) « FXITech
Thorium: A safer alternative for nuclear power generation?
OPERA confirms earlier claims of faster-than-light neutrinos
OPERA confirms earlier claims of faster-than-light neutrinos
The 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator
The Rootkit Of All Evil – CIQ | xda-developers
I2P - Anonymity for the Masses
I2P Anonymous Network - I2P

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Political Islam // Articles // The Dhimmi is Forbidden to Read the Koran

The Dhimmi is Forbidden to Read the Koran -

The Dhimmi is Forbidden to Read the Koran

If you are a student of Islam, then you might have gathered that Islam has a doctrine of eternal hatred of Kafirs and their civilization. A student of Islam might also gather that after a 1400 year history of hostilities, murder, rape and enslavement that Islam was at war with us. But, the White House, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, FBI and CIA have informed us that this is not the case.

It started when Steve Emerson and Steve Coughlin were going to give talks about political Islam to the FBI and Homeland Security . Then the White House informed them that not only were they not going to talk about the Islamic doctrine and history of jihad, but that henceforth, no Kafir could talk to any Federal agencies, unless they were vetted by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now, Eric Holder, the Attorney General, has ordered a purge of all Department of Justice manuals and training of all material that will “offend” Muslims. "I recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts,"

Deputy Attorney General James Cole announced during the Washington conference. U.S. Attorney Dwight Holton explained that FBI training materials that even remotely link Islam to violence will be banned.

"I want to be perfectly clear about this: Training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive and they are contrary to everything this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for," he told Muslim activists gathered at the George Washington University law school. "They will not be tolerated."

The president and the Department of Justice do not stand for critical thought, on examination of all sides of a problem. The White House wants to see that Muslims are never offended. Notice that the White House does not say that the Kafir analysts are wrong in their facts and data. Instead, they say that facts have no place at the table. Our government no longer stands for logical thought, but only wants to insure that Muslims are not offended by Kafirs. The way for Muslims to not be offended is for the Kafirs to keep silent. This is pure Islamic doctrine, Sharia law.

Let’s go back to the time of Umar II, a caliph of Islam. Under Sharia law, the Kafir is to be made completely harmless to Islam and there are two parts to this mental castration. Here are two of the many oppressive terms of the dhimmi (a dhimmi is a Kafir who agrees to obey Sharia law) treaty that deal with Kafir knowledge:

The Pact of Umar, 9th Century CE, includes:

We [Christians] will not teach our children the Koran.

We will not make a show of the Christian religion nor invite any one to embrace it.

Kafirs must not have knowledge of Islamic doctrine. Kafirs must not make their civilization attractive to Muslims. Kafirs must submit to Islam, not the other way around. This is why we are changing how our textbooks explain America because Muslims will read them. Islam must be praised and the West denigrated.

You might wonder why they would not want Kafirs to read the Koran. After all wouldn’t they want the Kafir to read the wonderful Koran and become a Muslim? No, Islam wants for you to listen to a Muslim explain the Koran. A Koran reading Kafir might apply critical thought to the text and that would be a disaster. Only Muslims are allowed to know Mohammed and Allah under Sharia law.

So, as good Kafirs, we must remain ignorant and submit to Islam. We can become Islamic, but we should never try to convert the Muslim to our civilization and Western religions. Submission only runs one direction.

The Obama administration has invoked an ancient treaty, the Pact of Umar, and applied it to our nation. Our law enforcement agencies have now been made full dhimmis under Sharia law. Critical thought and knowledge of Islam have entered the first step of making any knowledge about Islam a hate crime that will be prosecuted to the full extent of a Fascist state. Now they deny truth. Next they will criminalize truth that offends Islam
Tribal Fates: Why the Navajo Have Succeeded | Geography & Culture | Jared Diamond | LiveScience
Top 10 Implications of Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos | CERN Neutrino OPERA Experiment | Particles May Be Traveling Faster Than Light | LiveScience
What Would It Be Like to Travel Faster than the Speed of Light? | Faster-than-light Neutrinos Could Turn Physics On Its Head | Superluminal Travel | Life's Little Mysteries
Is the New Physics Here? Atom Smashers Get an Antimatter Surprise | Large Hadron Collider LHCb | Matter & Antimatter Asymmetry & CP Violation |

Saturday, November 19, 2011

10 Ways NOT to Raise Your Toddler | Parenting - Yahoo! Shine
UPDATE: Inflammatory report states Verizon shifts tax bill to the 99 percent, sees -2.9 percent tax rate | ZDNet
Occupy HTML - The movement to rid the world of HTML purism
EU Parliament Warns The US To Stop Censoring The Internet | Techdirt
Hublot painstakingly recreates a mysterious, 2,100-year-old clockwork relic - but why?
The Antikythera Mechanism - 2D - YouTube
McDonald's Cruelty: The Rotten Truth About Egg McMuffins

Friday, November 18, 2011

Why Simply Selling Our Airwaves Will Cost Us in the Long Run - Technology Review

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Can Anything Escape from a Black Hole? | How Particles Quantum Tunnel Out of Black Holes | Space & Cosmology | Life's Little Mysteries
Fight For The Future
American Censorship Day November 16 - Join the fight to stop SOPA
Relationship matching for dog and cat adopters
Omni-Crawler Drives In All Directions DigInfo - YouTube
Burton rolls out True 3D laser plasma display
Tel Aviv University's astounding
Future of Lab-Grown Organs is in the Bag | Artificial Organs | InnovationNewsDaily
13 Things You Never Knew About Your Weight | Healthy Living - Yahoo! Shine

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

AMD Breaks 8GHz Overclock with Upcoming FX Processor, Sets World Record - HotHardware
Why Is China Building These Gigantic Structures In the Middle of the Desert? | Danger Room |
40.452107,93.742118 - Google Maps

Saturday, November 12, 2011

‘Halo’ facts you might not know | Games Blog - Yahoo! Games
5 ways to help your pet live longer | Pets - Yahoo! Shine
Most Expensive Thanksgiving Ever? Super-savers Guide to Sky-high Turkey Prices | Shine Food - Yahoo! Shine
Op-Ed Columnist - Trouble With Trade -
Oligarchy, American Style -
Why Didn’t We Listen To Teddy Roosevelt Over 100 Years Ago? | MoveOn.Org

Thursday, November 10, 2011

banker bonuses

Nassim Nicholas Taleb has a
suggestion that won't sit too well with the banksters. In his NY Times
op-ed, Taleb writes: 'I have a solution for the problem of bankers who
take risks that threaten the general public: [1]Eliminate bonuses.' The
problem with the bonus system, Taleb explains, is that it provides an
incentive to take risks: 'The asymmetric nature of the bonus (an
incentive for success without a corresponding disincentive for failure)
causes hidden risks to accumulate in the financial system and become a
catalyst for disaster. This violates the fundamental rules of capitalism;
Adam Smith himself was wary of the effect of limiting liability, a
bedrock principle of the modern corporation.'"

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

presidential-candidates-slip-econ-101-cnnmoney: Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Ancient Mass Extinctions Hint at Possible Ocean Future | Wired Science |
FBI Says Gangs Infiltrating the US Military

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Private browsing: it's not so private
Proposed Copyright Bill Threatens Whistleblowing and Human Rights | Electronic Frontier Foundation
New House of Representatives bill may strangle the Internet or nerf the First Amendment | ZDNet
Is Ubuntu Linux Too Late to the Mobile Game? | PCWorld Business Center

Friday, November 4, 2011

Our Skin Cells Can 'See' UV Rays | Tanning & Skin Cancer | LiveScience
Why I Cheated on My Husband - Love + Sex on Shine

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Plan to Leave Euro for Drachma Gains Support in Greece -
This is what the 99% are talking about - Digg
This is what the 99% are talking about - Digg
Operating ‘Under the Color of Federal Law’ -
Boston Dynamics releases amazing video of its PETMAN bipedal robot

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Jamie Oliver interview: It's time we embraced our 'inner caveman' - Telegraph
Breadfruit, 'Food of the Future,' Has One Hitch: It's All But Inedible -